Jump to content

Scheaffer Gold Barley pattern from 1970s - model?


iddqd

Recommended Posts

Hi!

Wondering what the proper model name of this pen might be? Manual indicates it's from 1977/1978

579241419_13d1c527-ccb0-42df-bf18-b028e7079a35.jpg

579241419_a0e438ea-9db1-43c9-9bfa-2a86df6f827e.jpg

579241419_d309e00e-9a50-4a20-9d8b-0b4ab9de381d.jpg

579241419_dfe02a60-bd60-4216-b1ea-6970005315b3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Mercian

    2

  • iddqd

    2

  • bsenn

    1

  • Paul-in-SF

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Might be an Imperial IV. There's a gold-body pen I have with a different pattern (groups of 8 fine lines with an engraving cartouche on the barrel). Aside from the pattern in the metal, it looks quite a bit like yours -- maybe yours looks a little thicker, it's hard to tell. Mine is 137.5 mm long. The nib on mine says Sheaffer Lifetime, which your nib doesn't seem to say. So it might be in the same family but a slightly different model. 

 

What kind of filler is it? I have Imperials both with cartridge/converter and with Touchdown fillers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi @iddqd,

if you have a look on...
https://www.sheaffertarga.com/Imperial and Triumph/Imp Triumph Ref List.html

 

...and scroll down the page to find ref 827, you will find a link to the page for...

https://www.sheaffertarga.com/Imperial and Triumph/827 gold plated barleycorn pattern.html

 

Model 827- Sheaffer Imperial Gold Plated Barleycorn cartridge pen.

 

The one pictured on that page has a slightly different version of the inlaid nib to the one on your pen, but the style in which those were made varied down the years...

https://www.sheaffertarga.com/Inlaid Nib Write Up/Inlaid nib write up.html

 

...and your pen appears have the 1970s-style nib that one would expect, rather than the 1980s-style 'arrowhead' nib.

 

Your pen also appears to be a cartridge pen, rather than one of the earlier 'Masterpiece' pens, which were 'touchdown' fillers, and appear to have been solid gold (9k or 18k).

 

Slàinte,
M.

large.Mercia45x27IMG_2024-09-18-104147.PNG.4f96e7299640f06f63e43a2096e76b6e.PNG  I 🖋 Iron-gall  spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for fantastic info!

 

I'm entirely new to scheaffer. What kind of converter might I use in this pen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheaffers use cartridges and converters specifically for Sheaffer pens. There are squeeze converts, button converters, and piston converters. I believe all three fit your pen, but new piston converters are readily available from a variety of vendors.

 

Brian

One test is worth a thousand expert opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bsenn said:

Sheaffers use cartridges and converters specifically for Sheaffer pens. There are squeeze converts, button converters, and piston converters. I believe all three fit your pen, but new piston converters are readily available from a variety of vendors.

 

I agree with this ↑ post - I think that @iddqd's pen will be able to accept all Sheaffer converters, but: you will need to check a specific feature of the grip-section of your pen in order to determine to see whether or not the modern Sheaffer piston converters will fit in to it.

 

I recently acquired my first Sheaffer, and started a thread to ask about that (amongst other things).
Below is a link to my post that shows the converters that will fit in to my 1980s 'Triumph 444'.
It has photos of the squeeze converter, and the modern piston converter.
It includes a link to a discussion about how to tell if your pen will be able to take the modern piston converter.

 

 

I have been impressed by the firm, secure fit of these converters in to my pen.

 

Slàinte,
M.

large.Mercia45x27IMG_2024-09-18-104147.PNG.4f96e7299640f06f63e43a2096e76b6e.PNG  I 🖋 Iron-gall  spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general, pens with a metal overlay use the sections with metal threads.  This allowed the converter to sit lower on the section, down inside the threads, instead of at the end of them.  No firm proof of this, but I think that they did that so that the barrel liner could be shorter inside with the metal overlay maintaining the same overall length as the plastic pens. 

 

The two types are shown below.  The edges of the section are lined up.  The converter sits about 1/4" forward in the metal thread nib unit vs the plastic thread version.   The collectors in the two are different, and the nibs/shell are not interchangeable between these two.  The plastic thread bushings between C/C versions and Touchdown versions can be swapped out including desk pen (not pressure tabs)  or pocket pen (with the tabs) nibs.

 

spacer.png

spacer.png
Visit Main Street Pens
A full service pen shop providing professional, thoughtful vintage pen repair...

Please use email, not a PM for repair and pen purchase inquiries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now







×
×
  • Create New...