Modern Pelikan M800 EF vs F Discussion

[fope]

I'm trying to find out more about the difference between a Pelikan EF and F. The pen in question is the M800. The threads I found were all 10 years old or older. Most cited inconsistencies in the nibs. There were mentions of there being no discernible difference between the EF and F and sometimes even the EF writing thicker than the F. Some have stated that the EF nibs are scratchy. Others have cited misaligned tines out-of-the-box. There were suggestions to find and use reputable nib tuners throughout.

This thread is intended to document whether that sentiment of inconsistency still holds true or whether it has since been corrected.

 

Was it just a bad time for Pelikan nibs? Have they since tightened up their manufacturing process and quality control, some ten years later? Are both nibs now distinguishable, smooth, and aligned?

Edited September 25 by fope
Grammar

[Ron Z]

Keep in mind that nibs are graded according to where they land in a range  when measured.  That means that two nibs graded the same can be very different in actual line width.  Take a look at the Sheaffer nib size pinned at the top of the repair forum for their nib standard established in the 70s..    It is quite possible to have a medium at the thin end of the range, and a fine at the wide end of the scale that are very close.    Factor in ink wetness, paper, pressure and how the nib is adjusted and the medium could end up writing finer than the fine.  That's one reason why I always use the same ink, color and paper when testing nibs that I've ground, and often test on the test paper that the client sent so that I can get a line width that matches their preferred line.

[mulrich]

I follow the same process Ron mentions, using Waterman Serenity Blue for the first time I ink a new pen. I write some quick lines on a variety of papers so I can get a good sense for how the pen works. Serenity Blue is so reliable that if there's anything weird I know there's an issue with the pen and not the ink or paper. 

 

I have writing samples following this process going back almost ten years and across scores of pens. I swore I had a couple M800s with an EF nib but it looks like the only one in my collection hasn't been used. But comparing other pens of the same model with EF or F nibs, there is a difference between an EF and an F but there are times the EF looks the same as an F. 

 

nibs.com has a comparison page looking at nib widths across many of the major manufacturers. The page also mentions that actual width can vary based on a host of factors, even with the same nib (just as Ron mentioned). 

 

https://nibs.com/pages/tipping-size-comparison

 

And touching on your other comments…

I generally find Pelikan nibs to be very good writers out of the box. It's possible to get a dud but the same is true of any pen manufacturer (probably less so with Pelikan). My Pelikan's are from a wide range of years, mostly from the decade the OP is asking about, and I can't think of any that were notably problematic. 

 

The finer the nib the more likely it is to be scratchy. That's not to say you can't find a smooth EF nib but you shouldn't expect an EF to be as smooth as a M or B nib. If you want super smooth, go for a M or broader nib. 

[Uncial]

Pelikan nibs did go through a bad parch. They seem to have significantly addressed the situation since.