Jump to content

5 Best Diamine Inks


Fishynik6

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • A Smug Dill

    8

  • evyxmsj

    8

  • Fishynik6

    5

  • TSherbs

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I wonder what the tally would be!?

You're surely as capable as anyone else to tally up the number of separate mentions for the different Diamine inks so far, and if you were truly keen to know the results -- to date, or in a month's time, or when the thread has finally become inactive for three months, whichever is the time-frame you have in mind -- then no doubt you could perform the task, instead of waiting idly to be advised as an "information consumer". Don't you think it would be more constructive for you to just go ahead and do it, and then choose to share the results if you feel that's the kind of interesting information that other hobbyists and not just you would like to know too?

 

The O.P. has not signed in to the forum since April 2016, so the responsibility to summarise the information he solicited cannot possibly fall upon him now.

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're surely as capable as anyone else to tally up the number of separate mentions for the different Diamine inks so far, and if you were truly keen to know the results -- to date, or in a month's time, or when the thread has finally become inactive for three months, whichever is the time-frame you have in mind -- then no doubt you could perform the task, instead of waiting idly to be advised as an "information consumer". Don't you think it would be more constructive for you to just go ahead and do it, and then choose to share the results if you feel that's the kind of interesting information that other hobbyists and not just you would like to know too?

 

The O.P. has not signed in to the forum since April 2016, so the responsibility to summarise the information he solicited cannot possibly fall upon him now.

Dill, to state "I wonder" is not to make a request of anyone.

 

For the record, I wonder too. But my curiosity is mild, and likely fleeting.

Edited by TSherbs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dill, to state "I wonder" is not to make a request of anyone.

Indeed, and I didn't reject his/her request that was not made, but merely made a constructive suggestion of how the express curiosity can be satisfied, as well as acknowledged (or conjectured) his/her ability to do the work that would be required of someone for the results to become known.

 

I cannot see any way in which the tally can be arrived at with nobody expending any effort, so I think there is value is calling attention to the task, so that individuals can consciously, almost explicitly, decide for themselves whether they're really keen enough to make the effort or just let that glimmer of idle curiosity pass. For my part, I was more curious to know whether the O.P. of this thread was still active, so I went and looked the information up myself, then shared my discovery in case others may think perhaps the O.P. owed it to contributors of suggestions to do the tallying and report back to the readership.

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, and I didn't reject his/her request that was not made, but merely made a constructive suggestion of how the express curiosity can be satisfied, as well as acknowledged (or conjectured) his/her ability to do the work that would be required of someone for the results to become known.

 

I cannot see any way in which the tally can be arrived at with nobody expending any effort, so I think there is value is calling attention to the task, so that individuals can consciously, almost explicitly, decide for themselves whether they're really keen enough to make the effort or just let that glimmer of idle curiosity pass. For my part, I was more curious to know whether the O.P. of this thread was still active, so I went and looked the information up myself, then shared my discovery in case others may think perhaps the O.P. owed it to contributors of suggestions to do the tallying and report back to the readership.

Chill, Dill. You gave a lecture on the obvious (we know how to review and tally), and no one was expecting the original poster to do anything. You barked here where no bark was warranted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You barked here where no bark was warranted.

I expressly called out the task to be performed when it was implied there is work to be done. The only question was who ought to be doing the work. Do you have a problem with my asserting it isn't the absent O.P., implying that it's nobody else's (including @evyxmsj's) responsibility either, and suggesting that @evyxmsj do so because he/she was the party to express curiosity and apparently think the tally is information that is of interest to the readership?

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expressly called out the task to be performed when it was implied there is work to be done. The only question was who ought to be doing the work. Do you have a problem with my asserting it isn't the absent O.P., implying that it's nobody else's (including @evyxmsj's) responsibility either, and suggesting that @evyxmsj do so because he/she was the party to express curiosity and apparently think the tally is information that is of interest to the readership?

 

I don't need to repeat myself. Moving on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The list is much longer because Diamine has too many winners. But here's a list where I just stopped at 5*. These are among my can't do withouts (but again, there are way more on my list)

 

1. 150th Silver Fox (come on people, must I count the ways)

2. Emerald Green (pale to super saturated, easy easy easy to clean, super shading to low shading, nice on any paper color, no sheen no matter it doesn't need it)

3. Midnight Hour (very underrated new blue black on par with the Kobe inks we all rave about, but with a more traditional coppery red sheen)

4. Jalur Gemilang (wild wild wild, the companion purple is also a winner, but save that for another list)

5. Majestic Blue (classic, any of their blues will work through, there are like 30 shades)

6. And the list goes on and on and on....

 

 

 

 

 

*5.1. Music set Wagner (Yes, you're missing out on this murky ink. Up there with Sailor 970, Kobe 22, Iroshizuku Ina-ho, R&K Alt-Goldgrun, Diamine Safari, but rarely mentioned. Put it in a pen and see what happens.)

Yes to Midnight Hour. Really nice, somewhat wet.

 

Would anyone who has both Midnight and Midnight Hour do a comparison?

 

Or, if you have Midnight and not Midnight Hour, PM me and I'll trade!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was curious:

 

1 1864 blue black
1 acqua
1 amaranth
1 arabian nights
1 aurora borealis
1 blaze orange
1 blood orange
1 blue black
1 blue pearl
1 coral
1 crimson
1 deep dark orange
1 earl grey
1 emerald green
1 evergreen
1 exlipse
1 florida
1 golden sands
1 gray
1 green black
1 hope pin
1 imperial blue
1 indigo
1 kensington blue
1 lilac night
1 marigold
1 meadow green
1 meadow misty blue
1 mediterranean
1 merlot
1 midnight blue
1 night sky
1 ochre
1 orange
1 philip
1 presidential blue
1 safari
1 sapphire blue
1 schubert
1 scribble purple
1 sepia
1 sunset
1 tchakovsky
1 teal
1 tudor blue
1 vermillion
1 violet
1 wagner
1 yellow
2 acqua blue
2 aster
2 blue lightning
2 carnation
2 cornflower
2 grape
2 havasu turquoise
2 jalur gemilang
2 kelly green
2 marine
2 matador
2 mediterranean blue
2 midnight hour
2 misty blue
2 monaco red
2 pumpkin
2 ruby
2 saddle brown
2 turquoise
2 twilight
2 ultra green
2 wild strawberry
3 amazing amethyst
3 chocolate
3 classic red
3 eclipse
3 emerald
3 graphite
3 havasu
3 majestic purple
3 oxford blue
3 prussian blue
3 regency blue
3 registrar's blue-black
3 royal blue
3 soft mint
3 steel blue
3 umber
4 chocolate brown
4 damson
4 silver fox
4 syrah
4 terracotta
4 tyrian purple
5 bilberry
5 midnight
5 salamander
5 sherwood green
6 blue velvet
6 denim
6 eau de nil
6 macassar
6 red dragon
7 grey
7 sargasso sea
8 autumn oak
8 imperial purple
8 oxblood
11 asa blue
12 majestic blue
13 ancient copper
(I didn't correct any spellings, so "grey" and "gray" appear as different entries, as do "chocolate" and "chocolate brown", u.a.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ancient Copper

Oxblood

Imperial Purple

Presidential Blue

Freiburger Bächle Blau (a bespoke turquoise offered here by one of my local B&M shops)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ho Ho Ho( yes it is a colour)

 

Is that one of the Advent Calendar ones?

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Freiburger Bächle Blau (a bespoke turquoise offered here by one of my local B&M shops)

 

For your Freiburger Bächleboot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

For your Freiburger Bächleboot?

 

Never. That stuff is definitely not water resistant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering they make like a gazillion colors, even allowing a generous 5 picks makes for difficult choices. Newer colors (to me) means a new list:

> Macassar

> 1864 Blue-black

> Dark Forest

> Yellow

It's hard work to tell which is Old Harry when everybody's got boots on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if a lot of posters here are placing diamine inks in their top 5 based on how unique those inks are or how well they serve a particular need in the context of what other companies offer. For example, I see a lot of people ranking oxblood, autumn oak, ancient copper, and so on. Indeed, diamine is excellent at making interesting inks in the shades of orange, red and brown.

 

But if you had only diamine inks to choose from, would those be in your top 5?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if you had only diamine inks to choose from, would those be in your top 5?

 

It occurs to me that I rarely see anyone talk about Diamine blacks. Do they just make garbage black inks? I have not tried one, partly because it never comes up in lists of recommended black inks.

 

Whereas their other colors come up all the time in posts like this one or noob threads on reddit, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now







×
×
  • Create New...