Jump to content

Review: Platinum 3776 Century Sf (Soft-Fine) Versus A Field Of Flex Comparison


terminal

Recommended Posts

http://i1128.photobucket.com/albums/m496/gclef1114/IMAG0059-1_zps853b5090.jpg

 

that's a nice lookin ink. what ink is that?

-rudy-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • terminal

    32

  • andymcc

    6

  • rudyhou

    3

  • cybaea

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

This review is so specific and thorough, I love it. Thank you for all these comparisons it's very useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This review is so specific and thorough, I love it. Thank you for all these comparisons it's very useful.

Thank you! I actually think about this review a lot, and which other pens I could have included. Maybe a fine or extra-fine Falcon...

"One always looking for flaws leaves too little time for construction" ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I have a few Platinums. Recently added 3776 Century EF & SF. The SF is not soft. The EF is softer. I love my Pilot Heritage 91 MS. That is a "soft" buttery smooth nib. Overall Platinum nibs are stiff & fine, need work to be smooth. Pilot is my prference for Japanese soft nibs. I do not have a falcon nib. From what I've read I do not desire one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Platinum 3776 SF is now one of my favourite nibs but only after I have smoothened it. I don't mind nibs who give feedback but in this case there was just too much of it, bordering on scratchiness.

 

It is not a flex nib and it is not advertised as such but is definitely soft. Same amount of flex as on my Parker Sonnet 18k two tone gold nib. But unlike in Sonnet this feed can keep up which is surprising considering it is a pretty dry writer.

I like the balance of the pen and although they did not polish out injection mold parting line on the grip section it is a well build pen. For under 100$ not a bad pen.

Edited by 4lex Mood

Inked: Sailor King Pro Gear, Sailor Nagasawa Proske, Sailor 1911 Standard, Parker Sonnet Chiselled Carbon, Parker 51, Pilot Custom Heritage 92, Platinum Preppy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I definitely agree with you both about the Platinum SF feeling scratchy. It feels like it's cutting in to the paper.

 

My newest muse that I wish I had included is the Sailor KOP, which is at least as flexible as the Platinum SF and is like butter by comparison.

"One always looking for flaws leaves too little time for construction" ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Platinum 3776 SF is now one of my favourite nibs but only after I have smoothened it. I don't mind nibs who give feedback but in this case there was just too much of it, bordering on scratchiness.

 

It is not a flex nib and it is not advertised as such but is definitely soft. Same amount of flex as on my Parker Sonnet 18k two tone gold nib. But unlike in Sonnet this feed can keep up which is surprising considering it is a pretty dry writer.

I like the balance of the pen and although they did not polish out injection mold parting line on the grip section it is a well build pen. For under 100$ not a bad pen.

 

Mine needed some micro-mesh too, though it's quite nice afterward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! Amazingly ambitious review. I've been considering venturing into some modern flex and you've made me quite comfortable with my decision. Thanks a bunch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Platinum 3776 SF is now one of my favourite nibs but only after I have smoothened it. I don't mind nibs who give feedback but in this case there was just too much of it, bordering on scratchiness.

 

It is not a flex nib and it is not advertised as such but is definitely soft. Same amount of flex as on my Parker Sonnet 18k two tone gold nib. But unlike in Sonnet this feed can keep up which is surprising considering it is a pretty dry writer.

I like the balance of the pen and although they did not polish out injection mold parting line on the grip section it is a well build pen. For under 100$ not a bad pen.

 

LIke vonManstein, i do love using my SF nib, but it did take some work and time to get the nib to its lovely state today (12 months of use). I also had a dry feed, and a scratchy nib. So i followed the tips of other SF nib users here and patiently flossed the nib tines (slowly gradually increasing the thickness of the brass shims to start).

 

I also tried a couple of different Iroshizuku, Sailor & Waterman inks, and decided that Sailor Jentle Shiguru flows best (I have the Chartres Bleu pen).

 

Patience is the key, and lots of experimentation for me, and I am to date very happy with its performance!

Cheers,

Ryan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting review to read through. I wish the images were sill available. When I click on a link it seems to be loading but never shows up on my screen. Ah well, thanks for an interesting set of reviews and the comparison.

“Don't put off till tomorrow what you can do today, because if you do it today and like it, you can do again tomorrow!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we please stop necro-bumping threads that no longer have usable pictures?

 

Photobucket kind of broke the internet a couple years ago.

Edited by Honeybadgers

Selling a boatload of restored, fairly rare, vintage Japanese gold nib pens, click here to see (more added as I finish restoring them)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now







×
×
  • Create New...