Parker 65 Cumulus? Parker 75?

[Epictete92]

http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t120/epictete92/gold2.png

 

http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t120/epictete92/gold1.jpg

 

http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t120/epictete92/redandsilver.jpg

Hello,

 

1-Could you help me to confirm that the gold filled Parker is a 65 Cumulus, i hesitate because the nib seems to be the same as for the 61 Presidential.

2- Are the silver filled one ( fountain pen )+red laque ones ( roller ) Parker 75?

 

And if someone could be kind enough to give me an idea of value i would really appreciate : epictete92@hotmail.fr

thanks for reading this post

Kind regards

Jean Elie

 

[Kalessin]

Answering #2, both of those pens are 75's. More info: http://www.parker75.com

 

[JimStrutton]

#1 looks to be a 65 Cumulus, the 61 has a hooded nib. If you tell us what the markings on the nib are, we can maybe tell more also any markings on the pen body, should be a shield shape IIRC.

 

Jim

[Epictete92]

#1 looks to be a 65 Cumulus, the 61 has a hooded nib. If you tell us what the markings on the nib are, we can maybe tell more also any markings on the pen body, should be a shield shape IIRC.

 

Jim

 

 

Hello,

 

Thank you very much for the details and for that great link, i am always impressed with all specific link like this one !

On the "cumulus", i only have Parker Made in England, on the nib 14K 585.

Thanks again for your kindness

Jean Elie

[JimStrutton]

#1 looks to be a 65 Cumulus, the 61 has a hooded nib. If you tell us what the markings on the nib are, we can maybe tell more also any markings on the pen body, should be a shield shape IIRC.

 

Jim

 

 

Hello,

 

Thank you very much for the details and for that great link, i am always impressed with all specific link like this one !

On the "cumulus", i only have Parker Made in England, on the nib 14K 585.

Thanks again for your kindness

Jean Elie

 

Well the nib marking is dead right for a 65, but nothing on the pen body or cap is a surprise :hmm1: Strokey beard session need to think about that one.

 

Jim