Jump to content

Aurora 88 Serial Number And Year Estimation


praxim

Recommended Posts

First my request, then some background.

 

I am asking you please to post, for each vintage Aurora 88 / 88K / 88P that you own,

- the model and the serial number

- if it is an unserialised 88P, please state that.

- if you have documentary evidence of it, the year of manufacture / sale (not a seller's opinion please).

 

Background

I have collected quite a few models and serials from FPN, fleabay and my own few pens, and have compared this with the information in the Aurora 88 Dynasty and other threads. Now, I am seeking more data to improve upon it.

 

I have concluded from looking at existing pens that the serial number offers a useable source for dating the pens. It appears that they were applied as would be expected to each successive pen, regardless of model. The lowest serial I have found to date is under 47000, so we know that they did not kick off the process somewhere in the hundred thousands.

 

From the Dynasty thread, one would expect to see 88 and 88K serials intermingled for the period 1951 to 1953, and this happens. One would also expect from that source to see no overlap between the 88K and 88P and so far this too is the case.

 

However, based on total production information in the Dynasty, taking that as cumulative, one would expect a serial in the 2.5 M range to appear only on an 88K, but it appears on an 88 which ceased production in 1953. That implies that either fewer 88P were later produced to stay within 3.8 M total, or else more than 3.8 M were later produced if the inferred 1.3 M 88P were made. An alternative that practically no 88K were produced during 1954-57 seems unlikely!

 

However, no 88P so far has a serial as high as 3.3 M, far from 3.8 M. Casual reading also suggests there are more unserialised 88P around than the small number expected (I have one myself). This may account for the gap, if serialising ceased around 1961.

 

For these reasons I am asking for the above data to try to fill in some gaps.

 

I am already close to having a fairly good translation from serial to year, to counter optimistic sellers and simply for one's own entertainment. To do this I am obliged to make an assumption about non-linear production patterns in which production for each model ramps up quickly in year 0-1, plateaus around 2-4 years and declines in years 5-7. These mild curves are assumed but appear to give better results on known data than assuming flat production rates.

 

edit:minor and formatting

Edited by praxim

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • praxim

    34

  • sansenri

    6

  • jnb

    5

  • ParkerDuofold

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

unserialised 88P in the house.

Looking for a cap for a Sheaffer Touchdown Sentinel Deluxe Fat version

Link to comment
Share on other sites

888 2069913

88P 3418050

 

There's an 88 and another 888 around somewhere but right now I don't know where they are hiding.

 

Those serial numbers are secret known only to me and the manufacturer so make sure you don't tell anyone.

Edited by jar

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a project is long overdue! I asked Giovanni Abrate a while back if anyone in Italy had compiled such a list; he didn't know of anyone, but thought it a worthwhile task. Whether Aurora retains the info in its archives is another question that needs to be pursued.

 

Here are some numbers for 88s:

76656

228973

348720

440767

524582

564833

668582

672080

785072

860682

883304

1273437

1278943

1314517

1450530

1644009

1885802

1916010 (GL)

 

88K:

2038299

2051965

2067505

2172398

2537579

2556231 (GL)

guarantee for 1917686

 

88P:

3008446

3127365

3140775

3188641

3288165

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent project.

 

Here is what I can contribute:

 

1.

Aurora 88 (gold-plated cap, bleached ebonite section and turning-knob). 88889

The piston seal on this looks not so much like a cork as a series of felt rings tightly packed together

 

2.

Aurora 88 with silver-coloured (Nikargenta?) cap, marked: 836914

 

3.

Also, though you didn't ask about Duocart models:

88 Duocart with metal cap, marked: AV.0996

 

No idea about the year of manufacture or sale for any of them, I'm afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. I will add these to my ex-ebay list and see whether I can confirm or reject any notions. For the record, I have:

88 1039789, 1677535 and 1847540 (one of those is not yet in my hands)

88P 3210650 and unserialised.

 

I did not included 888 and Duocart because I was less clear about their start and end dates for production, but happy to add them as well, especially if someone has that production data? Would their production count be within or additional to the Dynasty thread data for 88s? I am assuming it would be additional.

 

Thanks to David's significant list, I should be able give some results later today.

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a preliminary puzzle. If you look at this ended ebay sale I read in the last two photographs that the pen is labelled 88 and that the serial is a seven digit number starting with 25, i.e. in the 2.5 M range. This is the big anomaly. Based on what I have so far (I welcome more) then, barring this particular pen, all 88 serials are less than 2M, all 88P serials are greater than 3M, and there are no overlaps. The first 88K so far has the serial 1917686 whereas the last 88 is 1916010.

 

We know that the 88 and 88P caps are not interchangeable, but those of the 88 and 88K seem to have been. However, that anomalous pen is marked on the section both front and back, not on different parts of a pen which might have been put together. The pen itself is quite corroded in both cap and ring. Reading the Dynasty thread again, I see that the 88K had a black insert in the cap, whereas the 88 (and early 88K) did not. The ebay pen has an 88K cap and to all appearances an 88K serial number, a late one at that. Any explanations anyone wishes to offer? If this pen is a real 88 then it was produced in 1957, four years after production of the 88 ceased. I may simply ignore it as an outlier unless there is confirmation through another anomalous 88.

 

Did anyone on FPN buy it?

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reflecting on the above anomaly, I conclude from the serial number and cap that the pen is an 88K made in 1956 or 1957. I account for the '88' on the pen (rather than 88K) by assuming worker error. Looking at the engravings on a few pens, they are slightly different in the way 'Aurora' or '88' or other digits are written. The 1950s is a bit early for computerised NC machine tools ( B) ) so engraving would be using hand tools or at best a hand-guided engraving head. My conjecture is that someone wrote 88 instead of 88K, and that will do for me unless unusual new data comes to light. edit: I notice on my two 88P that one says "Aurora" below 88P where the other simply says 88P. The latter is the serialised one.

 

With that conjecture incorporated, here is what I know so far:

 

It was suggested in the Dynasty post that production of the 88 and 88K may have overlapped. I am convinced this did not happen. diplomat based their view on a presumption that not much over a million 88s were made, yet they knew of 88 serials as high as 1.7M. Well, they hit 1.9M and no 88K has a lower serial than the highest 88. I conclude that there were more 88s produced than was presumed.

 

I have 33 serials for 88s, ranging from 46498 to 1916010 in a fairly uniform distribution. Assuming (as I do) normal sequential numbering, this gives a production run between 1.87M and 1.91M, a bit higher than the 1.5M estimated in Dynasty and about 240,000 annually. If I decide to set production at half that in the first year, 1946, and the last when the 88K was introduced,1953, then I get the following basic table giving for each year the last expected serial for that year. A serial close to that number may be from that or the next year.

CAVEAT: The iguanasell history suggests first production in 1947 while this article says it commenced in November 1948. If the last were true then they were producing far more pens each year than any of the articles suggests. Pentrace also suggests overlap of the 88 and 88K, which is not supported by serial numbers. I am writing to Aurora to ask. Meanwhile...

1946 119750

1947 399375

1948 678938

1949 958599

1950 1238063

1951 1517625

1952 1797188

1953 1917000

 

My assumption of a flat production rate with half as many in the first and last years is just that, a working assumption (I abandoned my hand drawn curve of production as having no greater merit). However, I doubt that numbers would shift a lot. Only when someone can turn up a few pens with fully verifiable production dates will I be able to improve on this.

 

On the above basis, my own pens are 1950, 1952 and 1953. I have less than half as much data on the 88K and 88P serials but will offer what I have in a further post, later.

 

More data welcome! :)

Edited by praxim

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am waiting on a reply from Italy. It may not eventuate so I will continue with what I have.

 

Firstly, I am revising the above list to start production in 1947. It certainly does not seem to have started in 1946 despite the claims of some sellers, and I am a little unwilling to go to 1948 without more certain information. Other than the first production year, these changes make surprisingly little difference to dating.

1947 137,187

1948 466,437
1949 795,686
1950 1,124,935
1951 1,454,185
1952 1,783,434
1953 1,920,621
To use the list, travel the list until the last number which is greater than your serial number. That is the year. If you are within a few tens of thousands of the given number then it could be either side of the that number. For example, a pen marked 1450530 is nominally 1951 but might easily be 1952 whereas 799238 is nominally 1950 but might be 1949.
I will update this if I receive better information from Aurora, else this will do for the original Aurora 88.

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

88K and 88P production appears, on the serials available, to have been about a third (each) of that for the original 88. This is quite different from the "Dynasty" information. However, it is pretty consistent with a count of pens available on ebay on sampling over a few days, despite the fact one might expect newer pens to be more likely to survive to today and thus be over-represented. I am unable to glean anything about 888 or duocarts. There is also the confounding factor that we do not know when Aurora ceased serialising the 88P.

 

I have a dozen serials for 88K pens and 14 for 88P, with three more known to exist unserialised. Given the overlap with the 88, I have put half of the first year of 88K production into 1953 where I also have half of a year of 88 production.

1953 1,986,502

1954 2,134,734
1955 2,282,966
1956 2,431,199
1957 2,579,431
For the 88P, I have no overlap and have gone to 1962. I believe there may have been some overlap with the 98 in 1963 but have eliminated that to account somewhat arbitrarily for unserialised pens.
1958 3,084,000
1959 3,168,000
1960 3,252,000
1961 3,336,000
1962 3,420,000
I hope these two posts are helpful in dealing with wild ebay claims and in simply being able to say something sensible when asked the age of your Aurora 88 variant.
edit: Note that it appears that 88P models started at 3,000,000, not at a number sequential with the last 88K. This will stand until such time as someone can show an 88P with a serial under that.
Edited by praxim

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A point arose that I think deserves some explanation here. diplomat's figures suggest about 1.5M 88, 1M 88K and 1.3M 88P. My figures suggest over 1.9M 88, under 700,000 88K and about 550,000 88P; total < 3.2 M. Do I think my numbers more likely and if so, what are my justifications?

 

The 88 is simple. Unless one presumes that serials were assigned randomly rather than in sequence (and the separation of pen serials between models rebuts that) then it is clear that there were over 1.9M of the original 88, simply because that is the range of serial numbers, and known 88K serials start very shortly after the last available 88 serial.

 

The 88P is relatively simple in that I can not be clear about it, because we do not know when they ceased to serialise them, a cost-saving measure (it was a manual task). We know it was at least 420,000 and probably not a lot more, which the 88K discussion below will help to explain. Either way, there are more serialised than unserialised extant so the odds are that you could top the 88P out at five or at most six hundred thousand, not 1.3 million. I suspect that the 88P ballpoint may be counted in the higher figure from diplomat. I have an 88P set myself.

 

Let us say that you asked, "Why should there not be 88K serials up to or close to 3 million, but in only 12 examples you just have not seen anything above 2.55 million yet?"

 

The answer involves working out this: if there were truly one million rather than 660,000 pens, how likely is it that one could choose 12 pens randomly (random selection being a reasonable assumption here) and see not one above a serial of 2.56 M? The answer to that is about half a percent, 0.5%. Clearly, if there were that many pens we ought to have seen one by now, 995 times out of a thousand.

 

Let us try some other figures. Based on the range of serials, the chances of there being 700,000 rather than 660,000 pens is about fifty-fifty. That there might be 800,000 is about 10%, 900,000 only 2% and a million the aforementioned 0.5%.

 

Note that the only serial I have for an 888 falls within the 88K range of serials, so not all of the 660,000 will be exactly the 88K anyway.

 

Barring new information we can be quite confident that the figures here better represent actual production of those three models than is proposed in the "88 Dynasty" post, where I believe ballpoints may be in the mix in later years.

 

edit: Modified numbers in first paragraph to the even chance level of maximum production, beyond the highest serial seen. For 88P I took 20% unserialised, not a reliable estimate but the best I can do on scant data for it.

Edited by praxim

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Nikargenta 88 (real Nikargenta as far as I can tell) with the number 928632

and a 88P, chrome cap, with no visible serial number, as far as I can see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Feanaaro. The 88P without serial makes me a little more confident that these are less rare than first thought. This may lead me to rescale the 88P production years slightly. by stopping serialisation a bit earlier, perhaps a year.

 

Your 88 looks to be 1950. That does not change the scales but every bit of data consistent with the hypothetical scales is good. :thumbup:

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an 88P without a serial number (could've sworn I'd sold it, but apparently not :rolleyes: ) That one has a gold cap. And I have another inbound from Italy that is also an 88P but with a chrome cap - no idea if it has a serial number, let you know when I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank E_o_C. I had already noted your unserialised 88P, along with another mentioned by someone on a thread here years ago. I will be interested to see whether your new pen breaks any boundaries in the arcane world of serialisation.

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an 88, serial number 1317400.

It came with the original packaging and papers for a completely different 88, serial number 573307.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

88 wiith Nikargenta cap 585 395

88 with gold cap 1 260 528

88K 2 137 700

Edited by MalcolmH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/3/2017 at 11:49 PM, praxim said:

Here is a preliminary puzzle. If you look at this ended ebay sale I read in the last two photographs that the pen is labelled 88 and that the serial is a seven digit number starting with 25, i.e. in the 2.5 M range. This is the big anomaly. Based on what I have so far (I welcome more) then, barring this particular pen, all 88 serials are less than 2M, all 88P serials are greater than 3M, and there are no overlaps. The first 88K so far has the serial 1917686 whereas the last 88 is 1916010.

 

We know that the 88 and 88P caps are not interchangeable, but those of the 88 and 88K seem to have been. However, that anomalous pen is marked on the section both front and back, not on different parts of a pen which might have been put together. The pen itself is quite corroded in both cap and ring. Reading the Dynasty thread again, I see that the 88K had a black insert in the cap, whereas the 88 (and early 88K) did not. The ebay pen has an 88K cap and to all appearances an 88K serial number, a late one at that. Any explanations anyone wishes to offer? If this pen is a real 88 then it was produced in 1957, four years after production of the 88 ceased. I may simply ignore it as an outlier unless there is confirmation through another anomalous 88.

 

Did anyone on FPN buy it?

 

Is this pen back up for sale?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, that is the one. I am thinking what discreet question I should ask to try to find out more. I also gave passing thought to how much I would be willing to pay simply to get a closer look. Not much; that pen is in poor shape.

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I have a sample of 38 rather than a dozen, I have recalculated the likelihood that a serial between the highest numbered other 88 and the serial of that mysterious "88" would not be seen in this sample. Accurate to at least four decimal places, it is zero, or < 1 in 20000. Possible of course, but something seems very odd. The number dates to 1957, years after 88 production was superseded by the 88K and nearly at the introduction of the 88P.

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      34598
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      28872
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27149
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    • Penguincollector 30 Mar 15:07
      Oh yes, pictures are on the “ I got this pen today” thread.
    • lectraplayer 29 Mar 9:19
      Is it here yet?
    • Penguincollector 26 Mar 5:00
      I just got the tracking information for my Starwalker💃🏻
    • T.D. Rabbit 3 Mar 12:46
      @lamarax I am horrified... And slightly intrigued. But mostly just scared.
    • lamarax 2 Mar 20:38
      Oh well. In case of failure you can always wring the paper to have a nice -albeit somewhat stale- cup of coffee back.
    • T.D. Rabbit 2 Mar 10:20
      @Astronymus I could use cornstarch... Or i could distill it and make it very concentrated.
    • T.D. Rabbit 2 Mar 10:20
      @lamarax That's what I used! (In reply to black coffee).. But the milk might not be good at all for paper.
    • Grayfeather 2 Mar 0:08
      Good day, all.
    • Gertrude F 20 Feb 17:58
      Sorry think I posted this in the wrong place. Used to be a user, just re-upped. Be kind. 😑
    • Gertrude F 20 Feb 17:56
      Looking to sell huge lot of pretty much every Man 200 made - FP, BP, MP, one or two RBs. Does anyone have a suggestion for a bulk purhase house? Thanks - and hope this doesn't violate any rules.
    • lamarax 17 Feb 18:05
      Cappuccino should work. Frothy milk also helps to lubricate the nib. But it has to be made by a barista.
    • Astronymus 17 Feb 16:19
      YOu might need to thicken the coffee with something. I admit I have no idea with what. But I'm pretty sure it would work.
    • asnailmailer 3 Feb 17:35
      it is incowrimo time and only very few people are tempting me
    • lamarax 31 Jan 21:34
      Try black coffee. No sugar.
    • T.D. Rabbit 31 Jan 8:11
      Coffee is too light to write with though I've tried.
    • Astronymus 29 Jan 21:46
      You can use coffee and all other kinds of fluid with a glas pen. 😉
    • Roger Zhao 29 Jan 14:37
      chocolate is yummy
    • Bucefalo 17 Jan 9:59
      anyone sells vacumatic push button shafts
    • stxrling 13 Jan 1:25
      Are there any threads or posts up yet about the California Pen Show in February, does anyone know?
    • lamarax 10 Jan 20:27
      Putting coffee in a fountain pen is far more dangerous
    • asnailmailer 9 Jan 0:09
      Don't drink the ink
    • zug zug 8 Jan 16:48
      Coffee inks or coffee, the drink? Both are yummy though.
    • LandyVlad 8 Jan 5:37
      I hear the price of coffee is going up. WHich is bad because I like coffee.
    • asnailmailer Today 14:43
      time for a nice cup of tea
    • Just J 25 Dec 1:57
      @liauyat re editing profile: At forum page top, find the Search panel. Just above that you should see your user name with a tiny down arrow [🔽] alongside. Click that & scroll down to CONTENT, & under that, Profile. Click that, & edit 'til thy heart's content!
    • liapuyat 12 Dec 12:20
      I can't seem to edit my profile, which is years out of date, because I've only returned to FPN again recently. How do you fix it?
    • mattaw 5 Dec 14:25
      @lantanagal did you do anything to fix that? I get that page every time I try to go to edit my profile...
    • Penguincollector 30 Nov 19:14
      Super excited to go check out the PDX Pen Bazaar today. I volunteered to help set up tables. It should be super fun, followed by Xmas tree shopping. 😁
    • niuben 30 Nov 10:41
      @Nurse Ratchet
    • Nurse Ratchet 30 Nov 2:49
      Newbie here!!! Helloall
    • Emes 25 Nov 23:31
      jew
    • Misfit 9 Nov 2:38
      lantanagal, I’ve only seen that happen when you put someone on the ignore list. I doubt a friend would do that.
    • lantanagal 7 Nov 19:01
      UPDATE - FIXED NOW Exact message is: Requested page not available! Dear Visitor of the Fountain Pen Nuthouse The page you are requesting to visit is not available to you. You are not authorised to access the requested page. Regards, The FPN Admin Team November 7, 2024
    • lantanagal 7 Nov 18:59
      UPDATE - FIXED NOW Trying to send a pen friend a reply to a message, keep getting an error message to say I don't have access. Anyone any ideas? (tried logging our and back in to no avail)
    • Dr.R 2 Nov 16:58
      Raina’s
    • fireant 2 Nov 1:36
      Fine-have you had a nibmeister look at it?
    • carlos.q 29 Oct 15:19
      @FineFinerFinest: have you seen this thread? https://www.fountainpennetwor...nging-pelikan-nibs/#comments
    • FineFinerFinest 24 Oct 8:52
      No replies required to my complaints about the Pelikan. A friend came to the rescue with some very magnification equipment - with the images thrown to a latge high res screen. Technology is a wonderful thing. Thanks to Mercian for the reply. I had been using the same paper & ink for sometime when the "singing" started. I have a theory but no proof that nibs get damaged when capping the pen. 👍
    • Mercian 22 Oct 22:28
      @FineFinerFinest: sometimes nib-'singing' can be lessened - or even cured - by changing the ink that one is putting through the pen, or the paper that one is using. N.b. *sometimes*. Good luck
    • Bluetaco 22 Oct 22:04
      howdy
    • FineFinerFinest 21 Oct 5:23
      I'm not expecting any replies to my question about the singing Pelikan nib. It seems, from reading the background, that I am not alone. It's a nice pen. It's such a pity Pelikan can't make decent nibs. I have occasionally met users who tell me how wonderful their Pelikan nib is. I've spent enough money to know that not everyone has this experience. I've worked on nibs occasionally over forty years with great success. This one has me beaten. I won't be buying any more Pelikan pens. 👎
    • FineFinerFinest 21 Oct 4:27
      I've had a Pelikan M805 for a couple of years now and cannot get the nib to write without singing. I've worked on dozens of nibs with great success. Ny suggestion about what's going wrong? 😑
    • Bhakt 12 Oct 5:45
      Any feedback in 100th anniversary Mont Blanc green pens?
    • Glens pens 8 Oct 15:08
      @jordierocks94 i happen to have platinum preppy that has wrote like (bleep) since i bought it my second pen....is that something you would wish to practice on?
    • jordierocks94 4 Oct 6:26
      Hello all - New here. My Art studies have spilled me into the ft pen world where I am happily submerged and floating! I'm looking to repair some cheap pens that are starving for ink yet filled, and eventually get new nibs; and development of repair skills (an even longer learning curve than my art studies - lol). Every hobby needs a hobby, eh ...
    • The_Beginner 18 Sept 23:35
      horse notebooks if you search the title should still appear though it wont show you in your proflie
    • Jayme Brener 16 Sept 22:21
      Hi, guys. I wonder if somebody knows who manufactured the Coro fountain pens.
    • TheHorseNotebooks 16 Sept 13:11
      Hello, it's been ages for me since I was here last time. I had a post (http://www.fountainpennetwork...-notebooks/?view=getnewpost) but I see that it is no longer accessible. Is there anyway to retrieve that one?
    • Refujio Rodriguez 16 Sept 5:39
      I have a match stick simplomatic with a weidlich nib. Does anyone know anything about this pen?
    • The_Beginner 15 Sept 16:11
      dusty yes, glen welcome
    • Glens pens 11 Sept 1:22
      Hello, Im new to FPN I'm so happy to find other foutain penattics. collecting almost one year ,thought I would say hello to everyone.
    • DustyBin 8 Sept 14:34
      I haven't been here for ages... do I take it that private sales are no longer allowed? Also used to be a great place to sell and buy some great pens
    • Sailor Kenshin 1 Sept 12:37
      Lol…
    • JungleJim 1 Sept 1:55
      Perhaps it's like saying Beetlejuice 3 times to get that person to appear, though with @Sailor Kenshin you only have to say it twice?
    • Sailor Kenshin 31 Aug 21:06
      ?
    • Duffy 29 Aug 19:31
      @Sailor Kenshin @Sailor Kenshin
    • Seney724 26 Aug 22:07
    • Diablo 26 Aug 22:05
      Thank you so much, Seney724. I really appreciate your help!
    • Seney724 26 Aug 21:43
      I have no ties or relationship. Just a very happy customer. He is a very experienced Montblanc expert.
    • Seney724 26 Aug 21:42
      I strongly recommend Kirk Speer at https://www.penrealm.com/
    • Diablo 26 Aug 21:35
      @Seney724. The pen was recently disassembled and cleaned, but the nib and feed were not properly inserted into the holder. I'm in Maryland.
    • Diablo 26 Aug 21:32
      @Seney724. The nib section needs to be adjusted properly.
    • Seney724 26 Aug 18:16
      @Diablo. Where are you? What does it need?
    • Diablo 26 Aug 16:58
      Seeking EXPERIENCED, REPUTABLE service/repair for my 149. PLEASE help!!!
    • Penguincollector 19 Aug 19:42
      @Marta Val, reach out to @terim, who runs Peyton Street Pens and is very knowledgeable about Sheaffer pens
    • Marta Val 19 Aug 14:35
      Hello, could someone recommend a reliable venue: on line or brick and mortar in Fairfax, VA or Long Island, NY to purchase the soft parts and a converter to restore my dad's Sheaffer Legacy? please. Thanks a mill.
    • The_Beginner 18 Aug 2:49
      is there a guy who we can message to find a part for us with a given timelimit if so please let me know his name!
    • virtuoso 16 Aug 15:15
      what happene to the new Shaeffer inks?
    • Scribs 14 Aug 17:09
      fatehbajwa, in Writing Instruments, "Fountain Pens + Dip Pens First Stop" ?
    • fatehbajwa 14 Aug 12:17
      Back to FPN after 14 years. First thing I noticed is that I could not see a FS forum. What has changed? 🤔
    • Kika 5 Aug 10:22
      Are there any fountain pen collectors in Qatar?
    • T.D. Rabbit 31 July 18:58
      Ahh okay, thanks!
    • Scribs 29 July 18:51
      @ TDRabbit, even better would be in Creative Expressions area, subform The Write Stuff
    • T.D. Rabbit 29 July 11:40
      Okay, thanks!
    • JungleJim 29 July 0:46
      @T.D. Rabbit Try posting it in the "Chatter Forum". You have to be logged in to see it.
    • T.D. Rabbit 28 July 17:54
      Hello! Is there a thread anywhere 'round here where one can post self-composed poetry? If not, would it be alright if I made one? I searched on google, but to no avail...
    • OldFatDog 26 July 19:41
      I have several Parker Roller Ball & Fiber Tip refills in the original packaging. Where and how do I sell them? The couple that I've opened the ink still flowed when put to paper. Also if a pen would take the foller ball refill then it should take the fiber tip as well? Anyway it's been awhile and I'm want to take my message collection beyond the few pieces that I have... Meaning I don't have a Parker these refills will fit in 🙄
    • RegDiggins 23 July 12:40
      Recently was lucky enough to buy a pristine example of the CF crocodile ball with the gold plating. Then of course I faced the same problem we all have over the years ,of trying to find e refill. Fortunately I discovered one here in the U.K. I wonder if there are other sources which exist in other countries, by the way they were not cheap pen
    • The_Beginner 20 July 20:35
      Hows it going guys i have a code from pen chalet that i wont use for 10% off and it ends aug 31st RC10AUG its 10% off have at it fellas
    • T.D. Rabbit 19 July 9:33
      Somewhat confusing and off-putting ones, as said to me by my very honest friends. I don't have an X account though :<
    • piano 19 July 8:41
      @The Devil Rabbit what kind of? Let’s go to X (twitter) with #inkdoodle #inkdoodleFP
    • Mort639 17 July 1:03
      I have a Conway Stewart Trafalgar set. It was previously owned by actor Russell Crowe and includes a letter from him. Can anyone help me with assessing its value?
    • Sailor Kenshin 15 July 17:41
      There must be a couple of places here to share artworks.
    • T.D. Rabbit 15 July 12:45
      Hullo! I really like making ink doodles, and I'd like to share a few. Anywhere on the site I can do so? Thanks in advance!
    • Sailor Kenshin 6 July 17:58
      Pay It Forward.
    • AndWhoDisguisedAs 6 July 16:59
      where would I post wanting to trade bottle of ink straight up?
    • JungleJim 3 July 16:14
      @Bill Wood-- just look at the message below you that was posted by @PAKMAN. He is a moderator here on the forums.
    • Bill Wood 2 July 14:24
      Just checking on a classified section and where we are with that. Many thanks. Bill
    • PAKMAN 29 June 1:57
      @inky1 The software for the classified stopped working with the forum. So no we don't have a sales section anymore at FPN
    • inky1 28 June 16:49
      I am not sure which is the classifieds section
    • inky1 28 June 16:46
      IIs there a Fountain Pen Sales board anywhere on here?
    • dave c 25 June 19:01
      Hi. Anybody ever heard about a Royal Puck Pen. Very small but good looking.
    • Eppie_Matts 23 June 19:25
      Thanks! I've just ordered some #6's to experiment with.
    • Al-fresco 21 June 12:11
      @Eppie_Matts Shouldn't be a problem - I've just put a Bock #6 Titanium into a La Grande Bellezza section. Went straight in without any problem.
    • Curiousone11 21 June 4:35
      Any recommendations on anyone who specializes in original pen patents?
    • Eppie_Matts 20 June 1:32
      Hi all - I'm new to experimenting with pens and nibs. Can I put a bock 6 on a Pineider? Thanks!
    • penned in 16 June 17:33
      Hi, I'm new to this forum and was wondering where is the best place to sell a Montblanc ballpoint pen? Are ballpoints allowed here? It's a beautiful pen that deserves a great listing. Thanks.
    • ChrisUrbane 9 June 3:16
      I havent logged in here for a while. I have moved and when I try to change my location on my profile, when I go to save it, it sais 'page not found' and that I do not have authority to change that.
    • Dlj 6 June 20:19
      I am looking for someone who can repair a Waterman Preface ballpoint that won’t stay together
    • Penguincollector 30 May 14:59
      I just noticed that the oppsing team of the game I watched last night had a player named Biro in their lineup. He must be part of Marsell the oily magician’s cadre
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...