Jump to content

The Limits Of "synergy" And Cost-Cutting


olivier78860

Recommended Posts

So today I took a little while to tune my Parker Premier's ink-flow (it was a bit dry), and my Waterman Kultur.

I dismounted the nibs and feeds.

Let's see what I found :

http://i.imgur.com/xeOXY.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/uYzCE.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HCIS8.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/wY9hI.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/iJcLX.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HBgSb.jpg

 

Waterman Kultur : paid 7.5€ in July 2011.

Parker Premier : paid 310€ in December 2010.

 

Interesting.

*Edit : Of course, the Premier has a 18ct gold nib, and not the Kultur, so it's the same nib's design.*

Edited by olivier78860

http://i.imgur.com/bZFLPKY.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • watch_art

    2

  • olivier78860

    2

  • hari317

    1

  • AltecGreen

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Sure - but the gold nib is most of the cost of the Parker, too.

 

That's no different than Bock and Jowo making nibs for a lot of manufacturers and putting different names on them all is it? I thought only a couple companies still made nibs in house (montblanc and...pelikan?).

 

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the pictures it appears to me that the parker version is a step down in quality and finish. Both of the feed as well as the nib. The nib appears very poorly made-slit underside and the quality of the stamping-less crisply shaped nib.

 

The parent company is the same now, Rubbermaid, so maybe they are now even sharing parts.

In case you wish to write to me, pls use ONLY email by clicking here. I do not check PMs. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hari, the Parker nib isn't of lesser handcrafting quality, I had to add lots of additional light sources to show the shapes (it's dark today and I'm bad at photography). The only difference in shape on the nibs is the hook on the Waterman one.

The feeds are exactly the same, though. The ink conduit was enlarged a little by myself, so it looks different. Actually before I enlarged the conduit, both were exactly the same, except for the "M" engraved on the Parker's feed.

 

watch_art, I think Waterman/Parker still do their nibs, as for S.T. Dupont.

Edited by olivier78860

http://i.imgur.com/bZFLPKY.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure - but the gold nib is most of the cost of the Parker, too.

 

That's no different than Bock and Jowo making nibs for a lot of manufacturers and putting different names on them all is it? I thought only a couple companies still made nibs in house (montblanc and...pelikan?).

 

Cheers.

 

 

There are around 10 pen companies still making their own nibs. I might have missed one or two. Also, some Bock clients only buy the buys and make their own feeds like Omas.

2020 San Francisco Pen Show
August 28-30th, 2020
Pullman Hotel San Francisco Bay
223 Twin Dolphin Drive
Redwood City Ca, 94065

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterman are one of the companies still making nibs. Since they have the same parent company, it makes sense that Parker would buy nibs from Waterman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now







×
×
  • Create New...